Use the analysis to improve reasoning, not to label a person or dismiss a position by name alone.
Prompt
MetaCyberGuru reviewed
Map this argument: [ARGUMENT]. Separate the main conclusion, supporting premises, hidden assumptions and evidence. Identify any possible fallacy only after showing the exact reasoning step that creates the problem. Consider the strongest reasonable interpretation before criticizing it. Distinguish a formal error from weak evidence or a disputed premise, then suggest what would make the argument stronger.
What to customize
[ARGUMENT]
Expected output
An argument map with precise logic issues, evidence gaps and constructive improvements.
Check before you rely on it
AI output can be incomplete or wrong. Verify facts, run code, check citations and keep private data out of tools that your organization has not approved.
Comments
No comments yet. Add the first useful question or observation.